|
|
Why Do They Lie About Kinism?
Witness more lies here, authored by one Corrie Marnett, libeler in residence at “Sound of Grace.” And, further, why is it nearly always Christians who are the liars? Maybe they fear a Christianity that is not cowering in a corner of the Liberal Ward of this insane asylum of a society.
Why do Kinism’s self-appointed persecutors continue to lie and libel this “tiny and insignificant” movement? Maybe it’s not so insignificant, since everyone seems to be talking about it, for one. Perhaps it could be because they fear what they know is true, a truth they’ve denied their entire lives, the acceptance of which would rock them to their core? As a corollary, do they attack us with distortions and outright fabrications because the plain rendering of what we say would be readily accepted by nearly everyone with a modicum of common sense?
What Kinism does is simply claim that what was commonly understood about race by Christians 100 years ago (and even more recently) is true, and that the modern religion of equality is false.
What lies does Corrie Marnett tell about Kinism? Why, that we are…
...white supremacists who are washed and dressed in fine clothing who believe that genetics even play a roll in a person’s ability to be moral.
Isn’t it curious that the implication of the quote is that somehow ‘White supremacists” would ordinarily be lice ridden vermin, stoop shouldered mouth breathers with shifting eyes and soiled pants? Such language smacks of Goebbels, does it not? Now the propagandists of a “hygienic” society are the “Christians”. What a turnabout! Except this is the nastier version, the version Stalin would heartily approve. This is mental hygiene.
Why do our opponents always use such superlatives to address us: “fine clothes” and “without the sheets” and “under sophisticated verbiage” and so forth? Well, because we’re smart, articulate, and we’re right. And since they can’t beat our ideas, they have to resort to name calling: “white supremacist”, “Nazis”, ad infinitum, ad nauseam. Terms intended to automatically discredit an opponent before there has even been a debate, since these defenders of freedom and righteousness don’t want the free exchange of ideas in an open society -the one they profess to be defending. They want rows of automatons, each with a Ford Foundation approved ideological chip installed.
We Kinists long for someone serious and sincere enough to challenge us on the merits. None have come forward. And it is telling that the overwhelming majority of our opponents are White. Telling indeed. The industry of suggestion has done its work well. The Ford Foundation and the NEA and the Carnegie Foundation and Madison Avenue. The list goes on. So called “people of color” don’t attack us because they either agree with us or they don’t have the wherewithal to buy a computer. But Anthony Bradley uses White dollars to fund his pseudo-intellectual Jabberwocky. Go figure.
The only problem I can see with all this is that we’re not White Supremacists. We don’t believe the white race is generally superior to other races, especially on the basketball court or the dance floor, we simply prefer it to the others. Alas, the members of other races prefer their own kind as well. This instinctive segregation is something the equalitarians and forced integrationists can’t abide. That is because what such behavior says is that integration is not some wildly popular grass roots movement that the mean ole segregationists are thwarting. It’s rather the opposite, isn’t it? That without the interference of social engineers backed by tanks and “non-lethal crowd control devices”, there would be no race problem in this country since the races would keep to themselves. That is, if it weren’t the enticements we provide to minorities to contravene their natural inclinations. Such a preference for one’s own kind is verboten in a white person, and readily accepted, even celebrated in a “person of color”. The point is indisputable, and I will not even deign to argue it. Would it ever get through the censorship of our opponents as they report to one another on this “cult” of ours that many, if not most, Kinists support monetary reparations to blacks? How’s that for “racism” and judging someone by the color their skin? If you’re even slightly black of skin, you get a big fat government check! Now that’s the kind of racism I know every black person would agree with wholeheartedly. Think that’s patronizing? Think that demeans the ability of blacks? So do we. But we’re tired of arguing it. But more on the “cult” libel later.
Neither do Kinists believe that “genetics even play a roll [sic] in a person’s ability to be moral.” No, but it might play a role in a person’s ability to spell. Sorry, I couldn’t resist. This woman could not be more wrong about what we believe. Hard to account for, as we spell it out so clearly. Since Kinists are NOT genetic determinists, we do not believe that morality is “set” at birth. What we DO believe is that a combination of nature and nurture makes certain people more or less likely to succeed and thrive in modern Western society, and that by and large, minorities are not succeeding and thriving in modern Western society without massive assistance by the people for whom the culture is suited -since they built it- and a high tolerance for certain deleterious and costly consequences of that lack of adaptability.
We also believe that the majority ethnic group in this country has a stake in and a say about what the country will look like, economically, morally, socially, religiously, and otherwise, and that we resent our culture being diverted, blunted, stolen, and otherwise “ethnically cleansed” by the devotees of steamroller equality.
You see, we don’t need genetic determinism to make a great case for Kinism. All we need is the sentiments of people themselves and the common sense to say that entire genetic populations should not be the subject of massive social experimentation by government, industry, and academia, to force together uncongenial populations, the majority of which want nothing to do with the silly experiment in the first place. You want to know the truth? Ask people. We do!
But were we to get into the statistical and genetic side of the argument, which we almost never do, the facts there are even more overwhelming. So much so that scientists are now trying to figure out how to “spin” the realities of race to a world that has been hoodwinked by liberal propaganda for a generation. In the next five years it will become THE topic of dispute, and will even enter into political discourse. The genetics revolution is here, and it won’t play nice with the Marxist hogwash that equality is.
Now to the accusation that Kinism is a “cult”. It’s neither an original nor a meritorious claim. But here is another quote from the web page we’ve been discussing:
This is only the first layer. Remember, this is exactly how cultish sects operate. They pull people in by appearing “normal” and it isn’t until you buy what they are saying that you find out the rest of the story.
If Kinism is a cult then so is supralapsarianism or partial preterism. Last I heard you don’t have to get a body piercing or sign over your deed to a guru to be a partial preterist. But I could be mistaken. Let’s examine Kinism for a moment, shall we? Kinism has no official or unofficial leadership, no official or unofficial propaganda organs, no meetings, no organization, no rules, no mailing list, no NLP (neuro-linguistic programming) such as is used by the equality (advertising) industry, no talking points, no compounds, no flags, no tattoos, no costumes, no freaky haircuts, no guru, no budget, and no income. Until they buy what we’re selling? We sell nothing. You are free to leave this website at any time. REALLY! Click the “back” button in your browser if you doubt me. I won’t hold you against your will on this website, I promise. Kinists have “layers”. What a crock. We couldn’t get five Kinists in a room if you supplied the jug band and the barbecue. Kinists a sinister organization? Herding Kinists is like herding cats. You don’t. It’s the opposite of an “ideology”.
The truth is not for sale. Kinism is an idea that people are free to adopt or not, as they see fit. Fit your definition of a cult? Mine neither. The Krishnas have haircuts, the Aryans tattoos. The anarchists have hair dye and gas masks, and the police have badges and truncheons. The Mormons have planets and polygamy. The Scientologists have Hubbard and “reading rooms”. The Branch Davidians had a compound and guns, and the liberals have mailing lists and conventions, while the conservatives have the same. The AAers have 12 steps and cigarettes, and Aum Shinrikyo had nerve gas. Osama Bin Mossad had a long beard, fake passports, and “suicide bombers”. The Nazis had flags and a leather fetish. Getting the point?
Kinist have ideas, and that’s about it. There is no method, there are no levels, there is no secret doctrine. What we teach we teach openly in the public square of the internet. And if there were no threat that my car would be shot up or my boss would receive a lovely anonymous phone call, you’d know my real name. NOW who are the cultists? The ones who terrorize, and that means you who lie about Kinism and who attempt to harm those who espouse it, even when you lack understanding of what it is. And that’s the point. Genuine Kinism is not “awful” enough for anyone to really notice, right? So you have to dress it up in a Bogey Man outfit to get people to care about something they’d yawn about if they knew the truth. Isn’t that the essence of propaganda? NOW who are the cultists? You who lie about Kinism and persecute its adherents.
When will people stop lying about Kinism? Why, never. That is, not until it’s too late. Because the demographic tsunami is here as well, and it won’t be long until the only deterministic thing white folks will care about is deterministic elections and deterministic job quotas.
Comments:
So, we’re not doing the secret handshake anymore? And you mean to tell me I will no longer be receiving those great tapes that teach me how I’ll go to Heaven if I surrender my wife to the KI elders?
That’s it! I’m outta here! You guys are sell-outs! I’m calling my lawyer!
Posted by on 01/09 at 12:12 AM
--------------------
>>Herding Kinists is like herding cats.<<
ROFL!
*ahem.* Thanks, I needed that, after finding that my neighbor had been postally assaulted with THIS:
http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Help/Report_Form_&_Instructions/2007_Report_Form/2007_RFG.pdf
Posted by on 01/09 at 03:32 PM
--------------------
|
|