The question of why is fairly straightforward, so much so that you will almost never find it asked, since it leads to such immediate and dire conclusions about “we the people,” and our prospects for the future. The failure of democracy lies as much in ourselves as in the structural flaws inherent in the means by which majority rule operates. It was readily admitted and widely held among the fledgling nation’s “agents provocateur” -that collective store of secular “wisdom” that has been the polestar of our errant navigation- that democracy (whether of the republican variety or the less effete sort) is not meant for a slothful, an irreligious and immoral people. The reason is that it takes the worst traits of the governed and translates it very efficiently into what may be merely bad government, if not active tyranny, by and through the puerile delusions of the common stamp. One need only turn on the television for a few minutes and survey the fare there, even superficially, to understand why “popular government” can be no better than the lowest common denominator of popular culture. The common man does not provide his own cultural trough, but he is willing enough to feed from it. With democracy, you always get the government that you deserve, never better.  And that is not a happy outcome for the small minority who deserve better. Indeed, there are no happy outcomes for minorities in a democracy, that is, minority political and social views among the power elite of democracy’s inevitable “permanent regime”. For it is through the very weaknesses that foster the love of democratic government, that the industry of suggestion and delusion -a fantastically lucrative industry beyond any known source of wealth other than that which proceeds from the barrel of a gun- is able to present the cinematic bedtime story, indeed, the chimera of democracy, while the actual government, the cryptic and totalitarian bureaucratic-corporate network of alliances, hardens its fortifications against the inevitable, but sadly belated rebellion. In this context, there is no “we the people.” As the elite managers of this artificial conglomerate given the official misnomer of “nation” pursue their reckless but highly profitable course of replacing the founding people with a more compliant 3rd world contingent, never was it more clear that we have the sort of representative government that elects its people, rather than the other way around.

Even in its origination, our forced union was divided on the question of pure democracy. Ur-patriots and founding fathers John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, close friends for many years, came to bitter disagreement over the notion of the wisdom of the common man. Adams, being the true conservative of the two, knew that the rapacity and passionate envy of mobs were the enemies of the rule of law, of social order and domestic peace. As radical as our American Revolution was, agitators, agents provacateur, emboldened by emissaries from France, sought to expand the revolution, their aims in unison with the hyper-radical, proto-Marxist Jacobins, unifying the causes of “the people” into a transnational torchlight mob.  Moving to the current scene, these effects are still felt. The trouble for racial patriots is that this government was long established in power by the neglect of former generations, and we are habituated to its excesses. Even if you disagree with it, what do you do? Are you willing, as in an Indian Suttee, to place your loved ones on the pyre of your quixotic hopes for a better government? The totalitarian hold that the current regime, and all modern ones, exercises on us is incomparably greater than that which caused our forefathers to take up arms. The confiscatory taxes of today that are permanently ensconced in law are many times those our ancestors fought to throw off, and our “representation” is even more of a sham for being so widely thought the real thing. The propaganda ministry of our government has done its work well, with the result being that we may yet have before us the unique spectacle of watching our civilization decline precipitously in every measure, while being wholly unable to affect its course. That is why Kinism is focussed on cultural and economic secessionism, not on political activism.

To provide a ready example of the reach and influence of the dominant view, one need only observe the impunity with which pseudo-governmental organizations such as the ACLU, ADL, SPLC, and a host of other nightmarish and impersonal acronyms, are empowered to employ the tactics of intimidation, and literal terrorism, to suppress dissent from the regnant idiocies of current immigration policy, or ethnic minority “preferencing.” Here is the secret that no one within the “beltway” will ever discuss openly, but is the horrifying reality underlying the Machiavellian realpolitik that holds sway there: all ethnic loyalties and solidarities of whites must be destroyed or the US will come undone. But even this will sometimes, in a slip of the tongue, be admitted by less discrete members of the conspiracy of consensus that maintains us on our current collision course with national ruin. Such a slip was recently made by Barack Obama, in his description of small town (read White) Americans as embittered, clinging to guns and religion. Never were more elitist words spoken. Barack Obama, Harvard educated, trained in corruption and race demagoguery on the south side of Chicago, wants the U.S. to have the same sort of “democracy” as Brazil, and he’s far from alone on that score. The word “republic” appears to have been stricken from our collective memory, and that’s no accident.

Yet another problem that sensible racial patriots must face is that their comrades de camp love collectivism, if merely of the Fascist variety, which is more palatable to them, it seems, in its Teutonic costume. Democracy is well and good, they say, when it translates into the government-assured prosperity of the “volk”, but is any and every outcome of even genuine elections permissible or desirable? The answer of the traditionalist and genuine conservative -nay, the Christian- must be no. And this is why “volksfascism” is no better than the bogus appeals to populism made by so-called anti-establishment figures, and this is where Kinism diverges from any lumpen-proletarian’s idea of a “race state”. It’s the “state” part that we choke on. State as embodiment of the will of the volk? It’s totalitarianism of the old Jacobin strain, under proud banners, as distinct from the plutocratic variety currently in the ascendant.

And regarding collectivism, is it not something that so-called conservatives fairly froth to deprecate in AEI tomes? But what is democratic government if not political collectivism of the most crude sort? And what form of collectivism is it when the voting lever is being pulled by a whole sad, robotic syndrome born of Neural Linguistic Programming dripping from the lips of Desperate Housewives? Capitalist Democracy is not quite as well adapted for populating gulags as Communism (which is simply autocratic totalitarianism by the haves over the have nots with the “opiate” being ideology rather than Jaguars and Flat Panel TVs), but it’s gaining ground. Rather than sending our political prisoners to die in some icy archipelago, we have ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, TIMEWARNER, PBS, NPR, WB to anesthetize and lobotomize them. It’s far more profitable. When slaves think they’re free, masters are richer. 

Comments: