Sat, July 31, 2010
Register  or Log In:        
Kinism Online

The Tipping Point

“You know, Laurel, this morning I was looking to watch the news on TV, and I couldn’t find anything but Black news reporters or Black people being interviewed. And I do mean Black, not light-skinned at all. Yet I’d flipped through five different channels!” My elderly mother looked at me over the top of her reading glasses, her faded green eyes clearly distressed.

“Mama, that’s disturbing. What did you end up watching?” I handed her the cup of instant coffee she drinks every morning. No sugar, just creamer.

She stirred the coffee thoughtfully for a moment. “Well, sweetheart, I just turned the TV off. What could they have to say that would be interesting to someone like me?”

What indeed?

I didn’t think for a moment that the mainstream media news shows gave anything resembling a flying leap about who an ancient White woman wanted to watch read his or her TelePrompTer script. Far from it. After all, this demographic isn’t exactly the popular 18-49 crowd. The aging of the White population has made them seem irrelevant to the producers of our media buffet. You want to become invisible? Get old. It’s a sure way to do it. No cape or incantation involved.

It’s as if we’ve reached some kind of a tipping point in what kind of people will be presented in the media. Not just TV, but print media as well. Because of the changing demographics of the younger populace, fueled by the simple fecundity of Hispanic and Black populations relative to the lack of fertility shown by the White population, the editors and publishers of all sorts of publications are choosing the public face they will present by reflecting the younger faces they lust to sell to.

And it isn’t just the TV news anchors whose skin colors and demeanors have changed. I was paging through one of the slickly produced professional journals I receive each month from one teaching organization or another, when I noticed something new and different about the editorial content.

There were no White children shown in any of the photographs illustrating the articles in the magazine. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

There were a few White kids in an advertisement or two, but not one single White kid in any editorial photo.

There were Latinos galore and Blacks scattered through various classroom environments. One little guy even had his short, crimped curls carved into patterns that seemed to echo the convolutions of the human brain, that latter item being what the boy will really need in the classroom. Perhaps he thought if he carved his hair that way, the brain would follow?

When Whites were shown in photos, they were middle-aged, worn-looking teachers and administrators. The younger teachers shown were ethnic, save for a few.

Leafing through the pages, one might think NO White children attended government schools.

I know some do attend, but where were they in the pages of this journal? Did the editor even notice what he or she had done? Was it a knee-jerk decision to put these particular photographs where they were? Or was this a planned transition to the new face of government schooling in America?

It seems so convenient, so designed, to have the news anchors darkening as if dipped in cold tea, to have only the darker kids pictured in the photos in the magazines. The flyers for the local department store sales feature interracial couples, some Black and Hispanic, some Black and White.

I fear we’ve reached a tipping point.

I fear that White is no longer the face of America.

I fear becoming invisible, irrelevant.

 

 


| More

Comments:

That’s too bad. But its the truth. The outside world is a curious place through the eyes of an aging white american. The young, with no awareness of their traditions and heritage, blow in the winds of ill-seeded change wrought by the jewish dominated mainstream media. There is little familiar in the present that evokes reverance for the past, nor does the present seem to hold hope for the future. Civil War may provide an opportunity to make things right.

Posted by Tim Pennington  on  07/08  at  08:25 PM
--------------------

Hi, Tim Pennington!

I very much agree with your statement “There is little familiar in the present that evokes reverance for the past, nor does the present seem to hold hope for the future.”

I personally do not believe that Civil War is an opportunity to make things right, however, I do believe that White people need to look out for and protect the needs and rights of their own kind. The first place to start for the latter is to practice cultural secession, that is, to consciously stop participating in the mainstream media culture. And even prior to that step is making folks aware the step needs to be taken.

God bless,
Laurel

Posted by Laurel Loflund  on  07/09  at  12:58 PM
--------------------

My feeling is that the cultural transformation is only part of the solution. And whether it can be done on a large scale is another issue altogether. If it isn’t, then the surviving white communities would exist only at the mercy of the state and the alien hordes. This appears to be the direction of things.

However, a mass cultural secession is merely the precursor to Civil War, because at once you find yourself with two powerful movements, each of which does not tolerate the existence of the other. You can have a white America lead by whites, or a mongrel America lead by jews, not both. The dark America is out to kill white America, and it will be one or the other.

In any case thanks for the interesting and thought provoking articles.

Posted by Tim Pennington  on  07/09  at  08:26 PM
--------------------

You are very welcome.

While I hope and pray we never have to resort to Civil War, there are many people who share your beliefs. If it comes to that, well, I know which side I will be on.

Thanks for caring enough to come by here and participate.

God bless,
Laurel

Posted by Laurel Loflund  on  07/09  at  08:35 PM
--------------------

The Amish (our much-revered example of cultural secession) can only exist within the framework of a larger, white-dominated society with a respect for the rule of law and God-ordained rights. Absent this framework, they will be at the mercy of the hordes of parasitic “neo-Americans” who will look at their success askance and eventually seek to snuff them out.

The dependent can never tolerate the independent to survive and thrive. Secessionism can only work on either a massive, transformational scale, or in relative anonymity and dispersion -that is, hiding in plain sight. Concentrations of social dissidents are a temptation for persecution, which will eventually manifest itself, given no change in the trajectory of the social deconstruction being engineered.

So, granting hypothetically the accuracy of these observations, I concur that conflict may be an inevitable element of survival as a people. We may be a generation away from this occurrence, but absent widespread adoption of some form of Kinism, it is likely that we will come under increasing pressure to be conformed to the world. The existence and proliferation of Christian homeschooling is one of the key elements in white survival in the U.S., that is, preventing the indoctrination into cultural Marxism that is the primary purpose of public education (present company excepted). There’s a chance for us, but it has to happen simultaneously on several levels.

But it is never bad advice when you are a cultural dissident to sell your garment and buy a sword (gun) or three. Thank heaven for the Supreme Court’s recent narrow decision on that matter, which, of course, will be imperiled by future courts as the country lurches back and forth between factions and value-unity further fractures.

Posted by John Marshall  on  07/10  at  01:21 AM
--------------------

Hiding in plain sight gets old sometimes, and one longs for the company of like-minded believers. But I understand your point, John Marshall, about separatists living at the mercy of the larger society.

Sigh.

“The existence and proliferation of Christian homeschooling is one of the key elements in white survival in the U.S., that is, preventing the indoctrination into cultural Marxism that is the primary purpose of public education (present company excepted).”

Thanks for excepting me from the indoctrination squad. I do attempt to do exactly the opposite, but sometimes it’s like throwing sand into the wind.

I, too, believe that the Christian homeschool movement is the most positive development in White survival for many years. Too bad a sizable number of them think it a bad thing to be “racist,” and send their kids off to save the world outside of ours, instead of focusing their attention on what needs to be done at home.

God bless,
Laurel

Posted by Laurel Loflund  on  07/10  at  02:00 AM
--------------------


Comment Form

You must be registered and logged in to post comments. Register here.