Some Thoughts On Interracial Crime
We all know that when a European American is accused of an interracial crime, the news coverage is continuous and grotesque. The European American involved in the incident is automatically assumed guilty and branded as the most violent sort of racist. The case is cited as further proof of “universal and rampant White racism,” and so-called “experts” are paraded out to explain why “White people can’t get over race.” The usual suspects, the professional race-baiting Jackals, are given carte blanche air time to display their synthetic indignation and histrionics. We all remember well the anti-White media frenzy over the false accusations made by a lying Negress against the four Duke Lacrosse Team members. Such reporting is the result of the well-established and unquestionable news media bias against European Americans, and reporters and news editors can no more rid themselves of that bias than they can rid themselves of the need to breathe. This situation is a clear violation of an obvious moral code. But morality and legality are seldom related when European Americans are handed the dirty end. There is little we can do about it, as the media has a Constitutionally guaranteed right to indulge their congenital need to slander and libel us under the protection of “free speech,” while we can be charged with hate crimes for speaking the truth about the races. The news coverage of interracial crime is itself a government-sanctioned crime against European Americans.
Perhaps the reason for so much news time being dedicated to the odd instance of White-on-nonWhite crime involves an effort to “even out” the proportions. When a European American is accused of a crime against a nonWhite, the incident truly is news because of its rarity, whereas most interracial crime is assumed, usually correctly, to involve a nonWhite violating a European American – a scenario that is about as unusual as someone successfully crossing the street. The infrequency of White-on-nonWhite crime may also explain why Negros behave like schoolyard tattle-tales trying to deflect attention away from their own delinquency whenever a European American is accused of a crime. Every slanted and exaggerated news report about an accused European American, and all the faux angst and carefully choreographed protests and marches, are indirect admissions of the very truth they try to bury - that the vast majority of interracial crimes are committed against White people.
All violent crimes inflicted upon European Americans are necessarily crimes of proximity; the attacker must be close enough to be able to physically attack and dominate the victim. Of course, separation, that is, relocating, is the simplest solution, though it is a short-term solution and not nearly so effective as is a violent response. In fact, so many European Americans are moving away from Negrified areas that the phenomenon has come to be known as “White flight.” But many European Americans are self-loathing and possessed of a masochistic vulnerability to being called racist. Professional race-baiters are as well aware of this fact as they are of their dependence upon the industry, work-ethic, and tax base of a large White population. In Memphis, certain politicians of the Negro majority have capitalized on those two facts by claiming it is racist for European Americans to leave that crime-plagued city for safer places. I am deeply saddened and disturbed to know that many White people are sincerely torn between either leaving the city to protect their family, or staying put to avoid the guilt of being called racist. Many European Americans will choose to stay put in that dangerous place; their families will be in imperiled and their taxes will increase, and that money will be transferred away those families and to the support of a parasitically dependant, insatiable, and ungrateful race. Those European Americans are behaving stupidly, for the situation in which they are placing themselves and their families is avoidable, and I daresay they will be to blame for any violence that might be inflicted upon them by the very people they have chosen to support.
There is one aspect of crimes against European Americans that I think deserves particular attention, and that is interracial violence against European American women and girls. I first began noticing the phenomenon in 1992 when a young European American woman named Melissa McLaughlin was kidnapped by a gang of seven N-words. They took Melissa to a nearby trailer, and over the next several hours they tortured her in various heinous ways and repeatedly raped her, forcing her to clean herself with household cleaning solvents after each rape. Melissa’s ordeal ended when the pack of N-words took her to a nearby road and put several bullets into her head. More recent examples of violent interracial crime against European American girls are Channon Christian, who, after her boyfriend was murdered in front of her, was tortured and raped by five N-words over several days before they murdered her; 18 year-old Auburn University student Lauren Burke and 22 year-old University of North Carolina student Eve Carson were both murdered by N-words less than one week apart; Lauren Barnes was 20 years-old when she was murdered last year by her Singaporean boyfriend and the father of her unborn child; Jana Shearer was 21 years-old when she was murdered by her N-word boyfriend, who cut off parts of her body and ate them. In the sad cases of Lauren Barnes and Jana Shearer, even relocating to majority-White suburbs couldn’t protect them from harm, since their fathers allowed them to enter into miscegenated relationships. I don’t mean to be cruel, but in those two examples much of the blame must go to the parents of those young women, especially their fathers, because they allowed their daughters to engage in miscegenation. This fact in no way diminishes the culpability of the murderers who took the lives of those two young women. But the dangers to European American girls in miscegenated relationships are real and well-documented. A father who allows his daughter to enter a miscegenated relationship must do so out of either sheer ignorance of or misguided disregard for the obvious peril to his daughter. It is not simplistic to say that violence inflicted upon European American girls in miscegenated relationships is the most preventable of interracial crimes against our people.
|
