The White House avers it’s racist for CIA rogue group Al Qaeda to bomb blacks instead of whites. Had whites been killed exclusively in the latest round of African bombings, one scarcely would anticipate charges of bombing bigotry. The President’s words could equally be taken to indicate the need for more bombings in white Western countries to even the score. A tone deaf Administration official helpfully explained that black Al Qaeda members from West Africa complain that the organization is racist because blacks are only used in low level operations.
“In short,” the official said, “al Qaeda is a racist organization that treats black Africans like cannon fodder and does not value human life.”
Even in terrorism, we must take care to redress racial imbalances? So, if we understand this correctly, black West Africans are looking for affirmative action measures to be taken at Terror, Inc. because too few of them are promoted to such offices as VP of Suicide Missions, or Director of Explosives Placement, while too many occupy the ranks of red button pusher and human shrapnel. But conversely, we can also envision scenarios in which it is equally racist to refrain from bombing blacks or using them as bombs. Aren’t inequities of that kind just what what the EEOC was created to address? It only goes to show that where there’s a black, there’s a bias complaint. We know the intent is to stir up anti-Arab sentiment among African blacks, but is race bias in who gets blown up really the rhetoric the Administration wants to use? How about calling terrorism terrorism and not “man made disasters.” There’s a start. The Obama Administration shows signs of being the most racist Administration in the history of the United States, and yet we are supposedly in the post-racial era? Hardly.
