The Kinist Review

The primary activity of Kinism is just this: the posing of a simple existential question to those who claim to support the principle of popular government. And that question is whether a people, on the basis of mutual interest and voluntary association has the right of political and economic self-determination, and on that basis, the consequent right of nationhood. The aforementioned question having been answered in the affirmative, Kinism then proposes to ask whether a nation, once formed, has a right to promulgate such laws as will defend its national sovereignty and identity, on the basis of those originating mutual interests and bonds of voluntary association.

That is, whether is is permissible that nations themselves exist, and not only politico-ideological formalisms of pure power, whose refusal of national existence is claimed on the basis of prior considerations which, in practice, violate the principle of self-government. This, then, can only be the imposition of other-government, as against self-government, for reasons other than principle.The constitution of a nation being grounded in its identity, mutuality, and voluntary association, it requires no external assent to come into being. The White Nation already exists, by dint of this constitution, and awaits no recognition by the illegitimate government of the U.S., nor can its national charter ever be revoked, so long as there are those who will be voluntarily bound by that identity. It exists as a nation whose government has been forced into exile, and not as an association of chattel whose right to self-determination can be revoked by any external political potency.

Those who answer that no such right of self-determination exists, must cease all claim to support self-government, political self-determination, defense of minority, and every other pretense of democracy, and declare themselves for what they are: disciples of pure power, whose government flows from nothing more noble than their tentative hold on superior force.