The Centre Cannot Hold
by Billy Roper

More and more White people are telling me every day that they fear Obama being elected. They don’t like McCain because he’s far too liberal on important issues such as illegal immigration, and because of his ridiculous support for the ongoing occupation of Iraq, but they’ll vote for him or even Hillary in order to avoid a nonWhite president, and they’re not afraid to say so. They’re also not afraid to admit that most blacks will vote for Obama precisely because he is black, a nod to the fact that while Whites may not always act in their collective best interests, other races do. What’s interesting is that 28% of liberal Democrat Whites who currently support Clinton say that they would switch their support to McCain if Obama is the Democratic nominee.

If blacks vote solidly in favor of Obama, what remains to be seen is how high their historically low turnout will actually be, and whether other nonWhites, such as Mestizos, will join them in voting for Obama because he is a nonWhite, or stay home or even vote for McCain because Obama represents another minority group squabbling for what they view as their own share of the pie.

The Egyptians first made the mistake of importing black Nubians as slaves. Then they made the mistake of freeing them. Next, they made the mistake of intermarrying with them. Just as after the first twenty-five dynasties, the first mixed race part Nubian Pharoah signaled the end of ancient Egyptian civilization, many Whites openly express the sentiment that a nonWhite president will signal the end of America, as we know it. Lately, when I tell even the most liberal Whites that within our lifetimes our nation will become a third-world country where the people who created it are a minority, they don’t sneer or act offended, any more. They just nod sadly and wait for me to suggest an alternative.

We are that alternative.

Every day, more and more Whites are being forced to think about race. They can no longer pretend that their children’s future, and the future of our race and nation, is not at stake. This will be the most racially divisive election in American history, so far, and will serve as a catalyst for things to come.

It is our responsibility now, more than ever, to give them examples of courage and forthrightness, to embolden their own instinctive and healthy feelings which are bubbling to the surface, forced upward by the racial context of this election which is stirring their very hearts and souls.

Remind them at every opportunity that nonWhites think and act racially, and thus Whites must, as well. Remind them that a nonWhite president will expand affirmative action programs, pass anti-free speech laws, and limit every amendment in our Bill of Rights, to further the interests of their own race. Appeal to their patriotism in referencing Obama’s Muslim sympathies if you must. Ask them if millions of blacks will riot, loot, rampage, and murder Whites if Obama loses. Point out the effects which shifts to nonWhite rule have had on every nation in which it has ever occurred historically, including the recent examples of South Africa and Zimbabwe, if you can. But most of all, agree with them that an Obama presidency would not be good for White Americans, and then lead them to the next logical conclusion, that we must act in our own interests, collectively, in order to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.

Then, we can explain to them how corrupt the fixed system is, and that even the nominally White candidates are acting as traitors to their race and nation.

The iron is hot. Strike now!

(http://www.whiterevolution.com/story.php?id=195)

An interesting commentary.

Indeed, sometimes it DOES seem as if whites are afraid to act in their own collective self-interest. Not a survival trait…

Of course, I vote in favor of survival +

God bless,
Laurel

The title of the topic comes from a very important poem called The Second Coming by Yeats. The poem itself is a commentary on the decline of Western civilization. Yeats was close to Ezra Pound, a true hero of the West and driving force of the Vorticist movement.

  Turning and turning in the widening gyre
  The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
  Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
  Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
  The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
  The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
  The best lack all conviction, while the worst
  Are full of passionate intensity.

  Surely some revelation is at hand;
  Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
  The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
  When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
  Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
  A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
  A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
  Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
  Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
  The darkness drops again; but now I know
  That twenty centuries of stony sleep
  Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
  And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
  Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

I will have some more on Ezra Pound and his movement on my blog and will post them to the forum as well. I am staying away from home during the week due to work but I have decided to devote all the free time I can to my blog and the Kinism website.

Daniel J—

I am familiar with the poem. Strangely enough, there is a book on the required book list for high school instruction in CA whose title is Things Fall Apart. Unfortunately, it is a book about how an african fails to cope with change within his african tribal society, and some would say it indicts colonialism. On that last point I disagree, because the main character shows traits that seem typical of many african males—emotionalism, tribalism, and inability to restrain a tendency to violence.

We appreciate your contributions to our forums here on Kinism.net. Let us know your blog’s URL so we can visit it.

God bless,
Laurel

Tomorrow in Vinland

DanielJ - 06 April 2008 09:51 PM

The title of the topic comes from a very important poem called The Second Coming by Yeats. The poem itself is a commentary on the decline of Western civilization. Yeats was close to Ezra Pound, a true hero of the West and driving force of the Vorticist movement.

  Turning and turning in the widening gyre
  The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
  Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
  Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
  The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
  The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
  The best lack all conviction, while the worst
  Are full of passionate intensity.

  Surely some revelation is at hand;
  Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
  The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
  When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
  Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
  A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
  A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
  Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
  Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
  The darkness drops again; but now I know
  That twenty centuries of stony sleep
  Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
  And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
  Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

I will have some more on Ezra Pound and his movement on my blog and will post them to the forum as well. I am staying away from home during the week due to work but I have decided to devote all the free time I can to my blog and the Kinism website.

Hi Daniel,

I just wanted to comment that I have a great affection for several of the modernist poets, such as Yeats, Eliot, and, of course, Pound. Eliot wrote one of the best short treatises on culture that I have read. Now he is looked at as a “reactionary,” and coming from some of the revolting exponents of postmodernism, that’s a genuine compliment. Pound is somewhat problematic for his Fascism, but he was THE economic poet par excellence. Among the modernists he best understood the effect of economism on culture. His poem With Usura displays this understanding, and despite its “bloodless” subject is one of the better poems of the 20th century in English.

His support for Social Credit monetary theory, a form of fiat currency in my opinion, however, is an obstacle to complete and unqualified adoption into the Kinist canon. Perhaps I am mistaken, but I believe he was disdainful of “goldbugs,” and Kinists are typically hard currency advocates because of biblical injunctions and hard currency’s anti-inflationary and anti-expansionist properties. Pound’s stance against Jewish money lending and other practices was also admirable. At one point, Europe’s entire monetary system was under the control of Jewish bankers, who had great influence over U.S. monetary policy through “Colonel” House and Paul Warburg among others. To what extent that condition exists today is a matter for research.

I just wanted to comment that I have a great affection for several of the modernist poets, such as Yeats, Eliot, and, of course, Pound. Eliot wrote one of the best short treatises on culture that I have read. Now he is looked at as a “reactionary,” and coming from some of the revolting exponents of postmodernism, that’s a genuine compliment. Pound is somewhat problematic for his Fascism, but he was THE economic poet par excellence. Among the modernists he best understood the effect of economism on culture. His poem With Usura displays this understanding, and despite its “bloodless” subject is one of the better poems of the 20th century in English.

I have been spending all available capital for book purchases on other types of materials outside the realms of fiction and poetry (save a horrifically misspent seven dollars on a used copy of American Psycho which I truly regret). I do however browse through the collections of Yeats and Pound when I spend time in the bookstore, however, that minimal time spent on their works does not do justice to the authors or my understanding of their arguments.

Pound’s radio broadcasts during his tenure in Italy I do have some depth of knowledge on and am very interested in. Perhaps we will start to go over them in the ‘research’ section of the forums.

His support for Social Credit monetary theory, a form of fiat currency in my opinion, however, is an obstacle to complete and unqualified adoption into the Kinist canon.

I’m not quite sure I understand exactly what you mean here. We must agitate for Social Credit theory within our ranks, or that we must adopt “hard” currency policies?

Perhaps I am mistaken, but I believe he was disdainful of “goldbugs,” and Kinists are typically hard currency advocates because of biblical injunctions and hard currency’s anti-inflationary and anti-expansionist properties.

He most certainly was extremely disdainful of “goldbugs” knowing that in practice gold is no different than any other forum of currency. It can be inflated (clipped, fractioned, et cetera) as history testifies. Rome couldn’t curb inflation or expansion. I’m afraid it is just the nature of the Beast. Our primary concern should be justice. I think erasing the debt record a la Fight Club with the celebration of a Jubilee would be a good start.

I must admit I’m actually ignorant of the Biblical injunction that we must utilize hard currencies. Scriptures?

Pound’s stance against Jewish money lending and other practices was also admirable. At one point, Europe’s entire monetary system was under the control of Jewish bankers, who had great influence over U.S. monetary policy through “Colonel” House and Paul Warburg among others. To what extent that condition exists today is a matter for research.

I believe the house of Warburg controlled I.G. Farben as well. (Not sure why I brought it up but it is interesting)

Perhaps we at Kinism.net can do the research and forum a ‘collective’ and Christianized Ezra Pound!