Indian immigrants are a similar threat: they seem to take pride in their being bastards, and some of the best Indians come here.
Frank, please clarify what you mean by Indian immigrants taking pride in being bastards? If you mean East Indians, their caste system is so rigid that I find it difficult to believe they would take pride in bastardy.
Indian immigrants are a similar threat: they seem to take pride in their being bastards, and some of the best Indians come here.
Frank, please clarify what you mean by Indian immigrants taking pride in being bastards? If you mean East Indians, their caste system is so rigid that I find it difficult to believe they would take pride in bastardy.
Thanks, and God bless,
Laurel
I realise there’s a great deal of diversity among them, so some “Indians” will likely have some pride, but the ones I speak with take pride in being… a blend.
One light skinned high caste girl comes to mind who appeared proud, but I never got a chance to speak with her. I did get to know a guy in college who claimed he was a prince of Kashmir, but of course there’s a very high chance he was full of it Actually his story sounded legitimate, but it’s statistically unlikely at least… He wasn’t very racial I think. His story of how his grandfather would soon have his palace and catacombs confiscated by the government essentially due to the Muslim hoards taking power there really shook me… The West isn’t the only area that’s losing its heritage.
Why a blend of all the races. I guess they could view themselves as the future of mankind then.
The ones I knew specifically would say they could go after both black and white girls because they were inbetween. So, perhaps the emphasis is on black and white, but I don’t think there’s any opposition to East Asian blending.
Someone sent me an article about a month ago - I’ll see if I can find it. There’s also an anti-capitalist/green Indian blog I found interesting at one time, till the blogger admitted he saw nothing wrong with genetic engineering, which for me is a big deal… I’m similarly anti-capitalist/small government and was arguing how the “left” is in many ways similar to a very right wing segment. When I heard him embrace GE I realised he was a nihilist with no central values, only peripheral “feel good” values rooted in pop culture.
The East Indians I have met have been very concerned with purity of blood and caste lines. The only thing I can think of is young people boasting, perhaps?
The East Indians I have met have been very concerned with purity of blood and caste lines. The only thing I can think of is young people boasting, perhaps?
God bless,
Laurel
Oh really? Well I’m glad to hear that. Yes, most Indians I’ve met have been young - maybe their society has shifted leftwards recently and their children brainwashed?
Our greatest threats are those who are closer to us racially but are not genuine than those like the Negro.
However those females who embrace the foreign and ignoble ones seal their own fates in spite of their apparent ‘intelligence’ and ‘conservatism’ it is laughable to suggest such a thing in connection with such a woman. All that conservatism is impotent without her being able to cling to her own root and the tree of like kind.
Indian immigrants are a similar threat: they seem to take pride in their being bastards, and some of the best Indians come here.
yes well I find them typically (or just the ones I’ve spoken to, debated with) lack in knowledge of their own history and faiths. They very much dislike someone suggesting that the rulers or founders of the ancient civilization were not brown. This idea that the civilization of India (or more specifically Aryavarta) came from India itself rather than an invasion is boosted by very contemporary Indian ‘nationalists’ - i use this term lightly b/c I hardly find Indians to be one people.
----------------------
Lauren asked a mix of what?
Mainly Australoid (another black race which dominates southern india and makes up their untouchable non-caste...which really doesn’t mean much anymore these days except that the lighter skinned ones avoid them.) and a mix of Nordic - or Caucasoid - the ancient Vedic peoples who over a period of time became inter-mingled with them (it’s much more complex really than this explanation but it will have to suffice). Along with a smaller element of asiatic or ‘Mongoloid’ blood. The last truly White dynasty or Kingdom in northern India was conquered by a pseudo-asiatic group the Huna (White Huns) who are postulated to be similar or connected to the breed which ravaged portions of eastern europe.
I question whether whites weren’t there prior to the Aryan invasion. Little is known of the Harrapan civilisation though it did I think have contact with Sumer and I want to say white skeletons have been found there. I’ll have to check back - this is partly why I need to put up a blog so I can just organise my own information…
Would it be difficult to believe yet another white civilisation fell to its nonwhite workers?
Oh really? Well I’m glad to hear that. Yes, most Indians I’ve met have been young - maybe their society has shifted leftwards recently and their children brainwashed?
I’m thinking that perhaps the young East Indians who move to the US to “get rich here” might have differing priorities than their parents’ generations. Back in the 1970s I met a whole slew of East Indians probably a generation older than the ones you might be meeting who were very, very, very concerned about bloodlines and caste; and, in fact, still practiced at least somewhat arranged marriages. I remember one young (in the 1970s) couple I met who seemed so happy and had a little girl. I was amazed at how happy they seemed, and I asked when they had met, and they said “On our wedding day.” That latter statement was jaw-droppingly surprising to me, because I’d never met anyone who’d had an arranged marriage before.
They went on to tell me how their parents had chosen spouses for them, what a long involved process it was (without the young folks’ input, either), negotiating between the families to make sure social status and income levels were at least approximately equivalent, the looks of the prospective bride and groom, and the “vedic astrology” component of the whole deal. Suffice it to say, that at least in their situation it seemed to work out. You still hear horror stories from India, however, about dowry burnings and mistreatment of wives, so perhaps they were an anomaly? They were Hindus, of course, and culturally coherent with that milieu.
But who knows what’s happened with the aggressive, success-at-any-cost young?
I don’t believe we should follow Hindu practices; but I find the people I met taught me something about cultural fidelity within marriage.
I’ve read some, probably by Dr. Fleming or another at Chronicles, on how ah sex can bring a husband and wife closer together - they grow to love each other over time. Also, since personality and character are often more important after the first 5 years or so of marriage (when a couple is madly in lust) is over, the nature of each spouse is more important than the physical appearance in the long run. And youth are immature and aren’t likely to be as knowledgeable about choosing spouses as are their parents - the parents tending towards choosing a good spouse for life, the children tending towards choosing a spouse for the next 5 years (based on lust).
Not to say I would want an arranged marriage, but I do find these arguments intriguing. Political issues related to marriages are also interesting (e.g. powerful families uniting via marriage).
And since marriage is primarily to produce children, a sane set of parents would arrange marriages within one’s race or nation (no marriages between blacks and whites) and the children would then have a good identity.
Frank, I didn’t say I was promoting arranged marriages...although there are some positive points about them. I am sure the reason why some Kings and nobles had mistresses on the side was because the arranged marriage with the official Queen was not to their taste, which is a downside to the political alliance style of arranged marriage.
Also, since personality and character are often more important after the first 5 years or so of marriage (when a couple is madly in lust) is over, the nature of each spouse is more important than the physical appearance in the long run. And youth are immature and aren’t likely to be as knowledgeable about choosing spouses as are their parents - the parents tending towards choosing a good spouse for life, the children tending towards choosing a spouse for the next 5 years (based on lust).
1) For just a very few it can last for a lifetime. Normally, once a year or two of marriage goes by, we are hit in the face with reality. The fireworks may stop blasting off, but a new type of love takes it’s place.
That answer is much longer, but that’s the summary of it.
The entire second answer was:
Psychologists say 3 to 18 months. They contend that after 18 months, if things go well, it develops into a less intense, but richer ‘companionate love.’ Check out a Developmental Psychology textbook that covers the entire lifespan.
Third one was amusing:
Psychiatry/Psychology is not an exact science so you can’t go by everything they say. I’ve been married for 35 years and wouldn’t it be nice if these doctors took a survery of long-time marriages and come up with something more than 3 -18 months!
I’ve read in other places that infatuation lasts about six months…
I completely agree with your statement about personality, etc. It’s always nice, however, when personality comes attached to a person one is at least somewhat attracted to physically.
We keep reading about vice-presidential candidates being “vetted” through advisors; I think it might be a good idea if potential romance partners were “vetted” through parents, trusted elders of the church, and close friends, both personal and family friends. I know that sounds like a lot, but we are talking lifetime love--or not--here.
And since marriage is primarily to produce children, a sane set of parents would arrange marriages within one’s race or nation (no marriages between blacks and whites) and the children would then have a good identity.
Goes without saying. Yet marriage is also a means to glorify God and promote the healthy of His Kingdom, so that must be kept in mind as well.
//I’ve read in other places that infatuation lasts about six months…
I completely agree with your statement about personality, etc. It’s always nice, however, when personality comes attached to a person one is at least somewhat attracted to physically. //
Lolz. Well people have this silly idea. Men are not predisposed to lead and women are not predisposed to learn and follow...so eventually some disorder of this combo is bound to distract someone of their infatuation for the other. I AM NOT married, but I have studied and do understand a few things on sexuality. It is best to teach her - I find most women don’t know how to have sex - they think just showing up is good enough. With men jockeying just get that hole-in-one women often feel compelled to nothing. I don’t say this is unique only to our age and time, but a man unwilling to teach and a woman unwilling to learn is a massive FAIL combo in sexuality and relationships. Also developing compatible schedule works - people need time off sometimes even if for a few hours of alone time. I’ve seen women cry for apparently no reason and rather then worrying about it I’ll give her alone time where she can pray/meditate/go for a walk or whatever. When I speak and am honest with her things usually go well and so long as the man holds her responsible for keeping her word he can learn to be trustworthy and she trustful in him.
Paul teaches in 1 Corinthians 7
v. 4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
v. 5 Defraud ye not one the other, except [it be] with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
v. 6 But I speak this by permission, [and] not of commandment.
So I would suggest that after the honeymoon period (metaphoric not literal) of the marriage and things are well settled and routines have been made that things like these fasting of sex are good to make for short periods so that we may learn to trust in Christ more and heed his word and in the same sense as the sabbath, and the 7th year of rest for the land this also will help to revitalize the sexuality to a new level in the end (although that is not the prime purpose obviously, but only a benefit of the fast)
==============================
I also want to add a scripture that is beloved of me the commandment for husbands to love your wives as Christ loved the church in that he gave his life for it.
“Husbands, love you wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word...”
Ephesians 5
Husbands are to teach their wives the scriptures which requires them knowledge of the word which is the Christ - they are also to teach their household (children) the word as well so this I think is a very important and folkish aspect of our faith which is often missed in the 50/50 bogus relationships of today. It also shows trust (knowing that trust is a sign of love) when the wife is willing not to go behind the husband’s back but to ask him about doctrine, gnosis, and spirit of the word when she is curious or ignorant. And just as a further side note trust is a huge element of sexuality. If she trusts me I can take her to new worlds and new realities - if she is closed and suspicious and fearful then I can do nothing - and she would then self-inflict arrested development in these matters upon herself.
[ Edited: 29 August 2008 08:30 PM by willyrobinson ]
Perhaps that post was a little TMI (too much information)? Don’t want to offend you, but traditional Christian doctrine reserves sex for marriage…
Men are naturally disposed to be leaders, however, and women tend to fall into line without realizing it when they trust a man’s leadership abilities, in many areas of life. Women may say that’s not true, but I see it demonstrated on a daily basis among my students.
I don’t want to know about the details of their “personal” lives, however.
Yea that’s a little too much I agree, but this might be valuable:
Defraud ye not one the other, except [it be] with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
Actually his story sounded legitimate, but it’s statistically unlikely at least… He wasn’t very racial I think. His story of how his grandfather would soon have his palace and catacombs confiscated by the government essentially due to the Muslim hoards taking power there really shook me… The West isn’t the only area that’s losing its heritage.
