2 of 2
2
Who shall be the object of our charity?
Posted: 24 October 2008 11:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
New To The Forum
Rank
Total Posts:  9
Joined  2008-10-04

It is interesting that Jesus had a “bloodline,” and that the entire Satanic tactic to ruin the Incarnation involved polluting the human gene pool with Nephilim and their offspring, like Sipai and Goliath. There were grafts, along the way, like Ruth and Rahab, but they were “race traitors” (in Rahab’s case) or “your God will be my God” type of people (Ruth).

I am happy with defining “neighbor” as 1. Someone who lives next to me and needs me or 2. Somone in dire need (not someone with a tire jack who needs a “ride").

I’ve always struggled with the race issue.

However, there really are no “poor” people in America.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 October 2008 10:46 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Inner Circle
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  143
Joined  2007-09-02

Also, Jesus’ example of the Good Samaritan shows us a DYING, SEVERELY BEATEN AND ROBBED distant kinsman, not some able-bodied person “needing a ride.” Does giving someone a “charity Christmas present” fit in that same category? I don’t think so, though it may be alright to give a “charity Christmas present.” We’ve just been sold the line that whatever someone perceives he or she needs is what we are obligated by the Good Samaritan parable to give.

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2