Here’s the radio show clip that gave the Anti-Defamation League [ADL] a reason to get all fired up against Pat - again. I’m sure the ADL will use this as a key issue in their next several fund raising letters.
Good interview, well worth listening to, as the Political Cesspool always is.
He’s walking the line once again by associating with Political Cesspool, though I guess he’d still eat were his reputation trashed. I’ll listen to the interview in the car now - gotta drive for a bit to feed and let out my parents’ dogs, grr (they’re on vacation… in the middle of the week.)
He’s walking the line once again by associating with Political Cesspool, though I guess he’d still eat were his reputation trashed.
I dunno...sometimes I think he’s gaining more spine as the years flow on...as events seem to lead me to the conclusion that they will trash our reputations anyway no matter how virtuously we behave, I wonder if folks like Buchanan have come to similar conclusions…
I’ll listen to the interview in the car now - gotta drive for a bit to feed and let out my parents’ dogs, grr (they’re on vacation… in the middle of the week.)
It’s good of you to do that for them. A very Kinist thing to do, even in the middle of the week.
Speaking from personal experience, sometimes the most Kinist (5th Commandment) things to do are the most inconvenient. But it’s good to do anyway.
It was brave of him to write this recent book, but I’m especially interested in this upcoming book mentioned in the interview: what is preferred to the Balkanisation Buchanan speaks of? There’s reconquest and there’s amalgamation… which will Buchanan pick?
It was brave of him to write this recent book, but I’m especially interested in this upcoming book mentioned in the interview: what is preferred to the Balkanisation Buchanan speaks of? There’s reconquest and there’s amalgamation… which will Buchanan pick?
Wish I knew!
Sometimes I object to the word Balkanization, because it implies eternal conflict. I mean, the Balkan peoples have been mad at each other since the year 900 or so, and taking revenge on each other for things done to grandparents or great-great-great-grandparents.
I prefer the word Segregation, despite its unfortunate connotations, or perhaps simply Particularization.
Probably Buchanan is referring to the conflict-ridden Balkan model. I don’t believe it has to be conflict-ridden.
Partition sounds good. The denotation (dictionary definition) and connotation (emotional charge) applied to words is tricky business. Partition sounds good, Apartheid (same word root) sounds awful to the politically correct.
Ah, I forgot Francis’s strategy: Eurocentrism, which seemed to me a sort of slow reconquest without openly stating it as such.
I mentioned this in another thread, and others have pointed this out too I know..., but currently we exist in a sort of anti-Eurocentrism - a slow conquest of America by nonwhites that doesn’t openly state it as such.
I bet… Buchanan ultimately favors Francis’s strategy, but I doubt he’ll ever say so.
The idea of fair partitioning is of course rather liberal, and those who are trying to be fair risk losing out to those trying to act in their own’s best interests. However, any policy of course would have to be declared as attempting fairness, or safety or some other just principle. Ideologies would wax and wane according to their benefit to white groups.
I hate to say it but under such a system, the example of Israelis trying to take Palestinian land without causing Palestinian or international uproar might become analogous. Or… perhaps more likely we’ll become like the Palestinians.
Perhaps Americans will have to readjust to a new political order, and accept that the American borders of old are gone… The borders of course aren’t holy.
But whites also need to adjust to the reality that they’re no longer in power over the world - the world is no longer ours. This liberal, objective, fair view… might not be a luxury future American whites enjoy.
Ultimately, some sort of secure white state is desired. We need some place to live… And it could be dangerous if nonwhites gain control of nukes and such from the fallen American empire.
Perhaps Americans will have to readjust to a new political order, and accept that the American borders of old are gone… The borders of course aren’t holy.
But whites also need to adjust to the reality that they’re no longer in power over the world - the world is no longer ours. This liberal, objective, fair view… might not be a luxury future American whites enjoy.
Ultimately, some sort of secure white state is desired. We need some place to live… And it could be dangerous if nonwhites gain control of nukes and such from the fallen American empire.
Yes, Frank, we need some sort of secure White state. We do need a place to live. Sigh.
Liberal-liberals say that civilization was evil. Conservative-liberals say we only need to preserve the intellectual processes and procedures of the old European civilization and not the heart and blood heritage of its people. (1) But the heart and blood of the white man is the soul of European civilization. Without it there is no civilization.
---------------------------
(1) Patrick Buchanan is an example of the liberal-conservative. In a recent book he writes about the unnecessary war, the Second World War, but it was only unnecessary if you are a kinist, someone who believes that race and faith bind a nation together. If you believe, as Buchanan and his ilk do, that a nation is based on an idea, then World War II was necessary to defend the idea of the universality of democracy.
Maybe he’s right… Catholics like Tolkien and Chesterton weren’t as liberal as present-day Catholics though. So, hopefully Buchanan hasn’t let his heart shrivel up completely.
Y’know that writer, Zmirak, over at takimag has me thinking two thoughts: are writers apt to be socially weak and thus socially isolated? And is Zmirak an example of a man without a nation, and as such is he representative of most of today’s Catholics?
